# Large Scale Geospatial Benchmarks

**URL:** <https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/large-scale-geospatial-benchmarks/805>\
**Category:** Tools and Web Services\
**Created:** [September 12, 2024, 6:47am UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/large-scale-geospatial-benchmarks/805 "2024-09-12T06:47:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmarmo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/cmarmo/32/271_2.png) [@cmarmo](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/cmarmo)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2024, 6:47am UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/large-scale-geospatial-benchmarks/805/1 "2024-09-12T06:47:31Z")

</div>

This might be relevant for the planetary community too.

> **[Large Scale Geospatial Benchmarks](https://discourse.pangeo.io/t/large-scale-geospatial-benchmarks/4498)**
>
> Hi All, We’re looking to build out a collection of large-scale, end-to-end geospatial benchmarks to ensure that tools like Xarray, Dask, etc. operate smoothly up to the 100-TB scale. @mrocklin and I wrote down a few characteristics we think make...