# What should be the categories for the forum?

**URL:** <https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56>\
**Category:** Forum Feedback\
**Created:** [May 14, 2019, 6:24pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56 "2019-05-14T18:24:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nmanaud](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/nmanaud/32/8_2.png) [@nmanaud](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/nmanaud)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2019, 6:24pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/1 "2019-05-14T18:24:53Z")

</div>

Based on:

- Scientific disciplines (surfaces, atmospheres, etc…)?
- Data workflows (production, visualisation, analysis, …) ?
- Tools and standards ?
- …

This is to get your opinion and start a discussion among the current members of the forum.  
Keep in mind that we aim to provide this service across all planetary science disciplines and communities.

Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CodeMacabre](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/codemacabre/32/137_2.png) [@CodeMacabre](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/CodeMacabre)\
**Post date:** [May 14, 2019, 6:37pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/2 "2019-05-14T18:37:07Z")

</div>

💯 GIS, maps and related tools and technologies. Probably best to distil it into a single ‘mapping’ category.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nmanaud](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/nmanaud/32/8_2.png) [@nmanaud](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/nmanaud)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2019, 7:50am UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/3 "2019-05-16T07:50:11Z")

</div>

As a example, here is how topics are categorized for the Planetary Data Workshop:

 ![pdw2019-topics](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/openplanetary/original/1X/456883a5d65f98a42a3d4d06a03bb67827877fff.jpeg)

@thare, all, would something like like make sense?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thare](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/thare/32/37_2.png) [@thare](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/thare)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2019, 2:22pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/4 "2019-05-16T14:22:47Z")

</div>

I think I would keep the list fairly short for now. How about…?

- GIS / RS Mapping Applications (QGIS, Arc, ENVI, JMARS, SBMT, etc.)
- 3D Visualization (and printing?)
- PDS/PSA archiving and services
- Planetary Data (locating, issues with, announcing new) – _okay if it overlaps with PDS some_
- Web Resources (processing services, APIs, web maps, SDI stuff, etc.)
- Programming (e.g. Python, PlanetaryPy, JavaScript, Jupyter notebooks, etc.)

more? And do we still need a catch-all for other “Tools”? I guess that would be like the “Data” category. Maybe:

- Tools (ASP, VICAR, ISIS3, GDAL, etc.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nmanaud](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/nmanaud/32/8_2.png) [@nmanaud](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/nmanaud)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2019, 11:54am UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/5 "2019-05-17T11:54:46Z")

</div>

@elakdawalla, based on your experience as UMSF admin ([http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com](http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com)), what would you suggest for OP Forum? Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aprossi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/aprossi/32/31_2.png) [@aprossi](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/aprossi)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2019, 2:39pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/6 "2019-05-28T14:39:59Z")

</div>

> [@thare](#):
>
> Tools (ASP, VICAR, ISIS3, GDAL, etc.)

I would say that tools together might be a bit too much. on the other hand isis3 has its own forum, but then tags could do so yes…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aprossi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/aprossi/32/31_2.png) [@aprossi](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/aprossi)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2019, 2:52pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/7 "2019-05-28T14:52:33Z")

</div>

ok, what about, to start with, building on @thare and @CodeMacabre inputs:

- GIS/Mapping Applications (QGIS, Arc, ENVI, JMARS, SBMT, etc.)
- OPM / Web mapping (JavaScript, web mapping frameworks)
- 3D Visualization (and printing?)
- PDS/PSA/VO/SPICE archiving and services (_perhaps a bit too big?_)
- Events / Job posting / announcements
- OP Data cafe
- Tools (processing packages, ASP, VICAR, ISIS3, GDAL, etc.)
- Resources (processing services, APIs, web maps, SDI stuff, etc.)
- Programming tools and workflows (Jupyter/Python et al.)
- Tutorials (_curated list of documentation, tutorials on the web?_)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thare](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/thare/32/37_2.png) [@thare](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/thare)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2019, 3:10pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/8 "2019-05-28T15:10:52Z")

</div>

Looks good to me - I assume always easy to add more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aprossi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/aprossi/32/31_2.png) [@aprossi](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/aprossi)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2019, 3:05am UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/9 "2019-05-29T03:05:50Z")

</div>

Hi Trent We are trying to further simplify this via subcategory and will post update here for discussion @nmanaud

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nmanaud](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/nmanaud/32/8_2.png) [@nmanaud](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/nmanaud)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2019, 8:50am UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/10 "2019-06-03T08:50:44Z")

</div>

Hi @thare, all - after iteration with @aprossi, I’m suggesting the following categories to start with (already added in Discourse with their description):

 ![11](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/openplanetary/original/1X/e58c16f7af23463df84e1da9e7acc134d69d60a1.png)

That’s already 7 categories. My concern is to avoid having too many categories, and putting walls between communities. However, could you please let me know what you think about it? In particular:

1. There is no “GIS/Mapping Applications” category but related topics would fit into the “Tools and Web Services” (sub-)categories (same would apply to “3D Visualization”, “Programming”…). Is it good enough or do we need a dedicated “Programming and Workflows” category for example?
2. The dedicated “Solar System Treks” sub-category, moderated by @emily.s.law ?
3. Is the difference clear enough between “Data Access and Discovery” and “Planetary Datasets”? Better naming or description?
4. The dedicated “PlanetaryPy” sub-category , alongside other “Community Projects”? @michaelaye @mariodamore
5. The dedicated “PDW 2019” and other “Events” sub-categories to be used in the coming workshops? @thare @aprossi

Please give me your feedback or ask me any questions. Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mariodamore](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/mariodamore/32/13_2.png) [@mariodamore](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/mariodamore)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2019, 9:06am UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/11 "2019-06-03T09:06:11Z")

</div>

Fine for me!

Better to start with fewer tags and then grow if we need.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thare](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/thare/32/37_2.png) [@thare](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/thare)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2019, 2:33pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/12 "2019-06-03T14:33:28Z")

</div>

Looks good to me - need 5 more characters to post - okay got it!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aprossi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/aprossi/32/31_2.png) [@aprossi](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/aprossi)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2019, 5:11pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/13 "2019-06-03T17:11:32Z")

</div>

Yes plan to use those for vespa(plan)map19. Sounds good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emily.s.law](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/emily.s.law/32/75_2.png) [@emily.s.law](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/emily.s.law)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2019, 3:43pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/14 "2019-06-04T15:43:39Z")

</div>

I agree that we don’t want to have too many categories. Organize subcategories within a main category is fine. Treks would be a good example under tools/web services. Absolutely, I will be more than happy to moderate Treks topics.

I have a question: To which category would the topic of “PDS4 data preparation for archival” belong? Also, I wonder if IPDA would be interested in using this forum as well.

Thanks for pulling this together! emily

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nmanaud](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/nmanaud/32/8_2.png) [@nmanaud](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/nmanaud)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2019, 3:53pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/15 "2019-06-04T15:53:31Z")

</div>

Excellent! Thank you @emily.s.law

- With my proposal of categories, “PDS4 data preparation for archival” would fall into “Data Access and Discovery” (Discussions about locating, accessing, and using data from PDS, PSA and other planetary data archives and databases; and about _preparing data for archiving in PDS_, and for interoperability.
- IPDA would indeed make a great sub-category. Here is it: [IPDA - OpenPlanetary Forum](http://openplanetary.discourse.group/c/data-access-discovery/ipda) 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emily.s.law](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/emily.s.law/32/75_2.png) [@emily.s.law](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/emily.s.law)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2019, 4:38pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/16 "2019-06-04T16:38:24Z")

</div>

Thanks for the quick response. Sounds good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nmanaud](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/nmanaud/32/8_2.png) [@nmanaud](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/nmanaud)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2019, 8:55pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/17 "2019-07-04T20:55:27Z")

</div>

@thare, would you and PSDI folks see the value of having a new “Planetary SDIs” category, that would include one sub-category per body: Mars SDI, Phobos DSI, Moon SDI, etc… ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nmanaud](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/nmanaud/32/8_2.png) [@nmanaud](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/nmanaud)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2019, 9:09pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/18 "2019-07-04T21:09:47Z")

</div>

@michaelaye: following our discussion in Flagstaff… I added the new ‘Programming and Workflows’ category, and moved ‘Python’ from ‘Tools and Services’. Feel free to add more sub-categories and content (ask me if you need permissions).

 ![04](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/openplanetary/original/1X/a5ca777a081f9ce6126701a7fbec92b35f590bf4.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brunomerin](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/brunomerin/32/207_2.png) [@brunomerin](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/brunomerin)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2021, 6:40pm UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/19 "2021-02-05T18:40:49Z")

</div>

Thanks Nico, very nice community and forum!

I wanted to ask whether there is somewhere a place where we could make job announcements as well? We are announcing the opening of a job at ESA that is very relevant for this community but but I cannot see any of the fora where it would fit well. Are these type of communications envisioned in this forum? To answer the question of this thread, should we have a jobs category in the Forum as well?

Many thanks in advance,

Bruno

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aprossi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openplanetary.discourse.group/aprossi/32/31_2.png) [@aprossi](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/u/aprossi)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2021, 8:01am UTC](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56/20 "2021-02-06T08:01:56Z")

</div>

Ciao @brunomerin ,

and… we got the #jobs category 😉

Please feel free to post there and tag with ESA, YGT, whatever you feel useful.

[Next page](https://openplanetary.discourse.group/t/what-should-be-the-categories-for-the-forum/56.md?page=2)
